Standard Operating Procedure

Errol Morris, USA, 2008, color, 35mm, 116'
Synopsis

Under the regime of Saddam Hussein, the Abu Ghraib Prison in Bagdad was one of Iraq's most notorious. In 2004, it made world headlines because of the degrading situations in which the U.S. Army put its prisoners. Photos attested to humiliation and torture, often sexual in nature, and a congressional investigation revealed that this was not just an isolated incident. In the way he is known for, director Errol Morris gives the floor to a number of those directly involved, including Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, Sargeant Javal Davis, military intelligence interrogator Roman Krol and Private First Class Lynndie England. The tautly filmed interviews, with the interviewees gazing straight into the camera, are interspersed with the contested photos and some strongly composed dramatizations. The guilty parties have now been tried and look back on their behavior in various ways. Some of them are baffled by their own lapses, while others wash their hands of the situation or play down the scandal. Most of those who refused to participate in the wrongdoing were dishonorably discharged from the army. The question is not only how all of this could happen, but also why the pictures were taken and to what extent a photo can influence public opinion and the course of history. And do we now know everything about the U.S. Army's misconduct in Iraq?

Comments
 
Jimini Hignett:
“Despite that fact that the appalling behaviour of the US torture machine should certainly be exposed, I felt that this film didn’t do so in a dignified way. The crass way in which Sony use the film as a long drawn out advertisement (notice that they also produced the film), and the aesthetisized imagery – slow-mo torture shots fit for a shampoo ad – do not do the seriousness of the subject justice. Worse still, I found them really off-putting. They trivialise what is more definitely not a trivial subject. Attempting to present torture in an appealing way – torture, appealing…? The film shows us what we all already know and I miss any attempt to portray the bigger and worser picture. I’d have preferred an over the top subjective version of this drama – something in the style of ‘Rules of Engagement’ instead of this un-sue-able blandness.”
Mark as improper 28 November 2008
nickelvd:
“De betrokkenen bij het Abu Graib-schandaal zijn doorgewinterde juridische klanten, en dat merk je meteen. Hun getuigenissen zijn gepolijst en maskerachtig. De martelfoto's hadden een aanknopingspunt kunnen zijn voor een meer filosofische documentaire over fotografie, wat ook kort wordt aangestipt. Maar nu is het eerder een informatief werk dat een beetje plichtmatig overkomt, mosterd na de maaltijd. Het is een standaardwerk voor wie meer wil weten, niets ontluisterends.”
Mark as improper 25 November 2008
Rithy Panh to present Top 10 at IDFA Cambodian director Rithy Panh (1964, Phnom Penh) is to compile this year’s IDFA Top 10. Rithy Panh broke through in 2003 with his documentary S21, The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine. His new film, The Missing Image, won the Un Certain Regard section of the Cannes film festival last week.
IDFA WorldView Summer School announces 2013 selection May 2, 2013 | A total of 16 projects from participants all over the world have been selected for the sixth edition of the IDFA WorldView Summer School, which will take place July 1-6, 2013. The projects hail from 14 different countries and range from archive-driven narratives to stories shot in a cinema vérité style.
IDFA 2013 Film Entry now open! March 5, 2013 | Submissions for IDFA 2013 can now be entered. Deadlines are May 1 (for documentaries completed before April 1) and August 1 (for documentaries completed after April 1).
SNS Reaal Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds